What do you think? We simply cannot extrapolate one report of minor side-effects to state that a particular intervention is safe, nor can we use a bland statement unqualified because we know there was considerable reaction to it. I hope that makes sense. Duly noted. It may well turn out to be so, but without solid data reported in quality secondary sources, we may be misleading our readership by implication, if we use the unqualified term "vaccine" right now.
What distinguishes Gam-COVID-Vac from other as-yet-unproven vaccines is that Russia has approved it for use, and that certainly is a significant point that should be discussed and put into context. Zefr talk , 11 August UTC If the vaccine is fully consistent with the legislative requirements of Russia and even is being produced, then why is it called a vaccine candidate?
If you want to mention that the vaccine is not licensed by WHO then what is the problem? If a vaccine is licensed in only one country without international acceptance of safety and efficacy , it is unproven to - and unlicensed by - the world scientific community and by the WHO which is the coordinator for assessing vaccine performance against specific diseases in pandemics. Wikipedia likes the latter, and rejects the former.
Please explain in more detail. Basically this is a fringe theory "this vaccine is only being criticised because other countries are envious of Russian supremacy" and would need some context before being aired on Wikipedia. A more neutral look at the dangers of this might be appropriate to use.
We are not an echo-chamber for political propaganda. So why then Bloomberg cites this "political propaganda" and lots of other outlets? Is Bloomberg a Russian propaganda edition in the US? I have nothing more to say. We are meant to base our article on secondary sources in any case. An unreliable source does not suddenly become reliable in general by being quoted in a reliable source.
I see Alright, see you in a week. Alexbrn talk , 12 August UTC I believe you actually were asced to openly list, if the vaccide is undertested etc. Prove me otherwise" flashcard. Oh, and by the way. He called himself "Guinea pig"? If not, this violates NPOV. While the source does not specify "guinea pig", the source quotes Mr. Duerte as saying When the vaccine arrives, I will have myself injected in public.
To claim he will be "experimented on" and that would happen "first" is a meaning of "guinea pig" in English. Nevertheless, I agree that it is very unclear so I have edited it. You apparently are not familiar with the common American epithet.
To quote the Guinea pig article: "Biological experimentation on domestic guinea pigs has been carried out since the 17th century. В теме на форуме вы можете убедиться, что не было подкручиваний голосов на момент скринов был голос, из которых 81 "да", 20 - "нет". Поэтому мы принимаем решение о дальнейшем обновлении сервера Phoenix с версии 4. Процесс подготовки к апгрейду займет примерно Примерная дата обновления запланирована на середину декабря.
Все временные рамки предварительные и не окончательные.